Networking-Forums.com

General Category => Forum Lobby => Topic started by: ggnfs000 on July 04, 2017, 02:29:40 AM

Title: relationship status
Post by: ggnfs000 on July 04, 2017, 02:29:40 AM
Name: Broadcom
FIancee: Brocade.
Relationship status: it is complicated.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-brocade-m-a-broadcom-idUSKBN19O1XF
Title: Re: relationship status
Post by: Dieselboy on July 04, 2017, 02:50:31 AM
Quote from: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-brocade-m-a-broadcom-idUSKBN19O1XFAs a condition of approval, Broadcom agreed to build a firewall to prevent the merged company from using information it gains as Cisco System Inc's (CSCO.O) supplier to compete in selling the switches as Cisco's competitor, the FTC said.

:twitch:

"Of course we wont steal your secrets and use it to make ourselves more money..."
... has a quick peek when no one's looking anyway.
Title: Re: relationship status
Post by: ggnfs000 on July 04, 2017, 03:12:56 AM
That is weirdest merger deal I have ever seen. Company putting a firewall within itself.
Title: Re: relationship status
Post by: deanwebb on July 04, 2017, 07:22:17 AM
Not just a data firewall, but a legal one as well.
Title: Re: relationship status
Post by: ggnfs000 on July 04, 2017, 12:10:09 PM
Clean room v2.0
Title: Re: relationship status
Post by: deanwebb on July 04, 2017, 12:35:45 PM
By the way, I at first thought the thread was about a personal issue, perhaps brought on by suggesting to a wife or girlfriend the need for active/active HA in the relationship, or perhaps clustering...

Such things do not always produce a positive reaction from the ladies...

:zomgwtfbbq: