Networking-Forums.com

Professional Discussions => Routing and Switching => Topic started by: sergeyrar on May 13, 2018, 03:04:12 AM

Title: VPWS vs X-connect
Post by: sergeyrar on May 13, 2018, 03:04:12 AM
What is the difference between these two L2vpn technologies?

The bits of info I was able to find but still don't answer my question-

VPWS:

Virtual private wire service (VPWS)—Has a characteristic of a fixed relationship between an attachment-virtual circuit and an emulated virtual circuit. VPWS-based services are point-to-point (for example, Frame-Relay/ATM/Ethernet services over IP/MPLS).

source: http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=680839&seqNum=10

X-connect:

Xconnects are used to connect 2 distant sites that can use any of these technologies : Frame-Relay, PPP, Ethernet, ATM, that's why xconnects are also called Any Transport over MPLS (AToM).

source: https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/68730
Title: Re: VPWS vs X-connect
Post by: wintermute000 on May 14, 2018, 04:52:22 AM
I think its more terminology than anything else. the actual traffic (EoMPLS) is the pseudowire, whilst the end to end LSPs comprise the VPWs service. Same same

https://wiki.mef.net/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=29753773
Title: Re: VPWS vs X-connect
Post by: dlots on June 22, 2018, 07:38:10 AM
VPWS requires MPLS to be running over it.  I honestly don't know alot about it though.

X-connect is IP only, so very little extra work you have to do.
Title: Re: VPWS vs X-connect
Post by: wintermute000 on June 23, 2018, 04:37:46 AM
actually xconnect is EoMPLS or L2TPv3