A Rant Thread About GUI Changes

Started by deanwebb, November 23, 2025, 08:15:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

deanwebb

Over the years, I've worked with a number of products. Some of them start out easy to use and stay easy to use. Some of them started out easy and then got harder because they added a bunch of features and didn't take time to clean up the GUI when integrating them or - worse - there's a totally different GUI for the add-on and it's way different from the one I got used to. And then there are the ones that didn't add features, but they did ruin the GUI and chose to double down on the crap instead of rolling back to what I was comfortable with.

A change in GUI is like inviting the competition in if the product doesn't have a "revert" button. I can see wanting to have a new look for marketing and sales purposes, but the daily users of the product likely have lots of memories attached to what they're doing and how they're doing it and changing everything makes them feel useless. Replaceable. Unimportant. Judged by the makers of the product and found wanting. And that makes it easier to burn a bridge and move on.
Take a baseball bat and trash all the routers, shout out "IT'S A NETWORK PROBLEM NOW, SUCKERS!" and then peel out of the parking lot in your Ferrari.
"The world could perish if people only worked on things that were easy to handle." -- Vladimir Savchenko
Вопросы есть? Вопросов нет! | BCEB: Belkin Certified Expert Baffler | "Plan B is Plan A with an element of panic." -- John Clarke
Accounting is architecture, remember that!
Air gaps are high-latency Internet connections.

icecream-guy

Quote from: deanwebb on November 23, 2025, 08:15:24 AMOver the years, I've worked with a number of products. Some of them start out easy to use and stay easy to use. Some of them started out easy and then got harder because they added a bunch of features and didn't take time to clean up the GUI when integrating them or - worse - there's a totally different GUI for the add-on and it's way different from the one I got used to. And then there are the ones that didn't add features, but they did ruin the GUI and chose to double down on the crap instead of rolling back to what I was comfortable with.

A change in GUI is like inviting the competition in if the product doesn't have a "revert" button. I can see wanting to have a new look for marketing and sales purposes, but the daily users of the product likely have lots of memories attached to what they're doing and how they're doing it and changing everything makes them feel useless. Replaceable. Unimportant. Judged by the makers of the product and found wanting. And that makes it easier to burn a bridge and move on.

Move forward or get left behind.... change is GUI is good as features may get added over time, but, oh the bugs, GUI that don't work as expected need a revert button.
:professorcat:

My Moral Fibers have been cut.

deanwebb

Thing is, those features can also be added without changing the GUI interface, like adding another line in a drop-down menu. Simple as that. This is why I love OfficeLibre, it keeps the old school drop-down menus that just *work*.

And when usability is sacrificed for the sake of "clean, fresh design", then I truly howl in pain. We have to do stuff via screen shares, so please let us have bigger fonts and better contrast between elements! Faint text and colors that are too much like the other colors will reduce the usability and productivity with the tool.
Take a baseball bat and trash all the routers, shout out "IT'S A NETWORK PROBLEM NOW, SUCKERS!" and then peel out of the parking lot in your Ferrari.
"The world could perish if people only worked on things that were easy to handle." -- Vladimir Savchenko
Вопросы есть? Вопросов нет! | BCEB: Belkin Certified Expert Baffler | "Plan B is Plan A with an element of panic." -- John Clarke
Accounting is architecture, remember that!
Air gaps are high-latency Internet connections.